Performance history
Every public workout since September 2025, with live totals and complete record-level detail.
Record nutrition in seconds, connect your biometrics, and ask Intelligence what's actually driving your energy — with the evidence behind every number.
I build StatsKey to answer a real question: how far can training principle take me?
The live record below follows the experiment from September 2025 forward: running, every publicly shared food recording, thirty-day Nutrition Insights, and the current training plan. Location coordinates never load in this public view.
Connecting to Ryan's record…
Every public workout since September 2025, with live totals and complete record-level detail.
Range-adjusted intake, every recorded nutrient, and food-level source evidence.
Individual meals, food items, complete nutrient fields, and source evidence.
The current block, this week's prescription, and its place in the marathon experiment.
Location is excluded. The public record can load workout measurements, splits, crop edits, and training context, but it never requests a route or any coordinate document.
Verified trackers are rigorous but slow and leave most micronutrients blank. Effortless photo apps are fast but shallow. StatsKey is the missing middle — low-friction capture, per-nutrient provenance, abnormality detection, and a connected model neither side has.
✓ yes · ~ partial · — no. Comparison from independent 2026 app reviews and vendor materials; StatsKey figures from code & internal evals.
Set a goal and StatsKey maintains the math: a formula ensemble tuned to your body, thirty days of Apple Watch activity, and your gap-aware weight trend, reconciled into one maintenance number and carried into weekly planning. When measured reality disagrees with the formula, reality wins — in proportion to the evidence.
Confidence gates the correction: Baseline (formula) → Medium (+ Watch) → High (+ weight trend). Manual edits always win — flip one switch and it's your number again.
StatsKey flags micronutrients outside your target range — low or high — then shows the evidence behind each value: confidence, food-level sources, and whether it was measured or estimated. A bison-and-rice nutrient label and its tryptophan sourcing show the whole chain without treating an estimate like a diagnosis.
Around 40% of people have a disorder of gut–brain interaction and ~12% have IBS; most name food as a trigger, but every trigger list is individual. In one US study, more than 60% of patients hid bowel-urgency symptoms from their own doctor out of embarrassment.
StatsKey's Gut Check records the whole episode — Bristol type with mixed-episode phases, urgency, control, passage, cleanup, red flags — and scores each one 0–10 for GI burden, right alongside food, fiber, glucose, and training. Gut–brain patterns compute from your own paired days, the record locks behind Face ID, and Intelligence can trace any rough afternoon back to the meals before it. No one has to say a word.
NIDDK (IBS ~12%) · Rome IV DGBI epidemiology (Sperber 2021; Palsson 2020) · Lilly CONFIDE (bowel-urgency underreporting).
Explore live previews of design studies, documented concepts, and early research programs — not commercial products or clinically validated devices. Each page makes the proposed architecture, evidence boundary, and validation work still required explicit.
Start free today, then add optional Pro ($4.99/mo) or Pro+ ($19.99/mo) when you want more — annual plans save more, and pricing is the same on the web, App Store, and Google Play. Free access is introductory, and pricing may change as StatsKey grows.
Now available in English, Spanish, German, Japanese, and Brazilian Portuguese.